On a scale from 0-10 how would you rate:
(I know, I know you probably thought "oh but [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_m]Grant[/name_m] is so much better…I got you but I wanna know your thoughts and ratings on this one folks)
5/10, it’s just fine to me! there’s nothing i dislike, but nothing i especially like. i’m not super fond of grant in general, but i like christopher so it balances out
6.5/10 - it’s a very handsome name when said together - but I find [name_m]Grant[/name_m] to be such an intense name for a sort of muscly, humourless and in your face type of guy (to be completely frank here). There’s also the issue of whether it’s a long or short A, and that can be fussy.
7.5/10. Great!
6/10. (I actually prefer the flow of [name_m]Grant[/name_m] [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] to the other way around 
) I think this is a handsome combo. I haven’t known the name [name_m]Grant[/name_m] on a little one, 6/10 reflects me trying to envisage this name on a young person, because [name_m]Grant[/name_m] is a very mature name to me. For an adult I’d boost it to 8/10, it’s very appealing.
Objectively, it’s a 7.5. It’s a solid, strong and distinctive name - familiar but not overused, short but not insubstantial and balanced.
(personally, it’s a 5 for me, nothing wrong with it, just a bit harsh for my personal tastes)
I actually prefer the sound of [name_m]Grant[/name_m] [name_m]Christopher[/name_m]! It feels sophisticated and charming, and I love the name [name_m]Grant[/name_m]. 7.5/10 for me!
I love it. 10/10. But I am biased. I have a [name_m]Grant[/name_m] [name_m]Patrick[/name_m].
7/10
Both names are strong and handsome; [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] is also so soft and classic. I can’t get over how the reverse would sound better, so the imbalance might be getting to me.