[name_u]Carmel[/name_u]
Assumpta
[name_f]Lourdes[/name_f]
Lourda
[name_f]Immaculata[/name_f]
[name_f]Perpetua[/name_f]
Banneux
Walsingham (I know that one isn’t but my DH said ‘why not if [name_u]Carmel[/name_u] is?’)
I think all of them work - [name_u]Carmel[/name_u] and [name_f]Lourdes[/name_f] as firsts, even - with the possible exception of Assumpta, Walsingham, and Banneux {though the latter is quickly growing on me}. I prefer [name_f]Lourdes[/name_f] to Lourda, and Immaculée to [name_f]Immaculata[/name_f], though both are gorgeous. Other possibilities:
I have to disagree with those saying [name_u]Carmel[/name_u] is usable because to me it’s really not. In the US, I feel like it’s like naming your kid Hot Fudge or Nougat. Caramel is something you put in candy or on ice cream. Maybe for a middle name but I’d honestly dislike it if it were mine.
I do like [name_f]Lourdes[/name_f], Lourda, and Banneux, and they could work as firsts. I agree that Banneux would be very cute on a boy!