I am thinking on the name [name_f]Meadow[/name_f] for a little girl. I’d like your opinion…
What would you think if you met a fair-skinned, light-headed little girl names [name_f]Meadow[/name_f]?
Would you pair it with another nature/free spirited name?
So far I like [name_f]Iris[/name_f] [name_f]Meadow[/name_f]. I really like [name_f]Meadow[/name_f] on its own, although I know many may not agree with me here (but if [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] is a name, couldn’t [name_f]Meadow[/name_f] be too?)
I like it as a middle, and it’s pretty lovely with [name_f]Iris[/name_f] (though I tend to prefer only one “word name” at a time). I would personally avoid using it as a first name. Cute on a kid (or a cat), but a grown woman named [name_f]Meadow[/name_f] may have a tough time proving herself outside of the art world.
I adore [name_f]Meadow[/name_f]! I am very fond of nature word names. I think its peaceful and sweet. I’m often in the minority around here because I find shorter, more “unsubstantial” names perfectly fine on their own.
I’ve grown up with a short, “cutesy” name ending in ‘ie’ and I’ve never had any problems.
[name_f]Iris[/name_f] [name_f]Meadow[/name_f] is beautiful!
I like [name_u]Prairie[/name_u] and [name_m]Heath[/name_m], but I’m not sure about [name_f]Meadow[/name_f]. As a middle name totally! but as a first…I don’t know why it just doesn’t thrill me.
I adore [name_f]Iris[/name_f], but paired with [name_f]Meadow[/name_f] it sounds like you’re describing a flower field and not a child.
I love [name_f]Meadow[/name_f]! I think it’s beautiful as a first or middle name. [name_f]Iris[/name_f] [name_f]Meadow[/name_f] is gorgeous.
I associate it with the spoiled daughter on The Sopranos, but it’s a pretty name. I’d avoid another word name, especially a nature name… as a previous poster said, [name_f]Iris[/name_f] [name_f]Meadow[/name_f] sounds like, well, a meadow full of irises, and not a person.