I like [name]Corinne[/name] a lot, though I actually prefer [name]Corrina[/name].
I do NOT like [name]Cleo[/name]; it sounds like it should be a cat’s name and it also reminds me of those silly ads that used to come on tv in the 90’s for the psychic named Ms. [name]Cleo[/name] (“call me now”). It also sounds a lot like [name]Leo[/name] with a C tacked on, which makes it sound less than feminine. Other than those random associations, it just sounds insubstantial, especially next to an elegant name like [name]Corinna[/name].
[name]Clea[/name] is slightly better (perhaps because it puts me in the mindset of the charming vintage [name]Thea[/name]) but still comes up short.
[name]Cleo[/name] and [name]Clea[/name] both don’t sound like full names, either, but like they should be short for something ([name]Cleopatra[/name]? [name]Don[/name]'t like this either!)
[name]Chloe[/name] would be a much better choice than [name]Cleo[/name] or [name]Clea[/name], but it’s not my favorite of the names you’ve mentioned. I could, however, see [name]Chloe[/name] and [name]Abigail[/name] working as twin sister names and complimenting each other well. The problem I see there is that they’re both so popular that it sounds like a very trendy combination (where either name alone sounds more classic than trendy). I would sooner pair [name]Abigail[/name] with another less popular name to highlight its richness and elegance rather than a name that only highlights the fact that it is in the top ten.
[name]Abigail[/name] and [name]Corrina[/name] could work!