Which one would be your choice and why?
Thanks
[name_m]Grant[/name_m] [name_m]Nicholas[/name_m]! I know a lot of men named [name_f]James[/name_f] so I like that [name_m]Grant[/name_m] is a little more unexpected, and I think [name_m]Grant[/name_m] [name_m]Nicholas[/name_m] sounds better – it flows really nicely, whereas [name_f]James[/name_f] [name_m]Grant[/name_m] is a bit choppy to my ears, since both names are one syllable!
Thank you!
[name_m]Grant[/name_m] [name_m]Nicholas[/name_m] flows the best!
[name_m]Grant[/name_m] [name_m]Nicholas[/name_m]. I lime the flow better and love [name_m]Nicholas[/name_m].
[name_m]Grant[/name_m] [name_m]Nicholas[/name_m] is my favourite - more distinctive and cool.
[name_f]James[/name_f] [name_m]Grant[/name_m]: It’s short and sweet and works on all ages. A little choppy but [name_f]James[/name_f] is soft enough to balance it out.
[name_m]Nicholas[/name_m] is nice but with [name_m]Grant[/name_m] as a first name, it feels old mannish and not in a good way (it would take a long time to grow into). I can’t see grant on a young adult. I can see [name_m]Nicholas[/name_m] fine on any age. [name_m]Nicholas[/name_m] [name_m]Grant[/name_m] would be nice.