Willow - for a boy. Charming or silly?

First off, I am not considering this. My boy list is air tight and I prefer Mallow on a girl (has the same sounds, feel). I actually KNOW someone with a son named [name_f]Willow[/name_f] (MN [name_u]Puck[/name_u] btw). I am not knocking it all. The boy wears it well and I do feel that gender ambiguous names do unfairly lend more to girls than boys. So how do you feel about this? Is [name_f]Willow[/name_f] gender neutral? I’d like to argue that since nature is both male and female, so should be nature names, however, I would be hard pressed to convince myself that [name_f]Rose[/name_f], [name_f]Lily[/name_f], [name_f]Wisteria[/name_f], [name_f]Zinnia[/name_f], [name_f]Freesia[/name_f], etc. could somehow work on a boy. [name_f]Do[/name_f] you feel that [name_f]Willow[/name_f] is too distinguished to the girls to work for a boy?

I love [name_f]Willow[/name_f] for a girl. That is our number one name for a future girl. That being said, it could possibly work for a boy. I just really prefer it for a girl because it has a more soft and feminine sound.

[name_m]Even[/name_m] though [name_f]Persephone[/name_f]'s second middle is [name_f]Willow[/name_f], I think it works fine on a boy. I know two male Willows and neither of them use nicknames. It has [name_m]Will[/name_m] as a nickname, and it has the same sounds as [name_m]Milo[/name_m] and [name_m]Hugo[/name_m].

Well [name_f]Willow[/name_f] is quite androgynous since its a nature name, although it tends to be used more for girls. It could work. Use it if you love it. :slight_smile:

It was the FN of the main character of the fantasy movie with the same name, which I was quite enamored with as a child, so it has always felt unisex to me for sure. I would love to meet a little boy named [name_f]Willow[/name_f].

Agree with [name_f]Moon[/name_f]. My introduction to [name_f]Willow[/name_f] as a name was the movie, with a male [name_f]Willow[/name_f]. I love it for both genders. I’ve never met a real male [name_f]Willow[/name_f], but I think it’s almost more suited to males than females, although it’s great for the girls, too.

I met my first [name_f]Willow[/name_f] ever last month- a man in his 30s. Never been crazy about [name_f]Willow[/name_f] on a girl but I like it for boys

When it comes to nature names most just blindly go with the gender they’ve heard it on. If they’ve heard it on a girl then it’s 100% a girl name. Of course there are names that just work better on one gender but many “girly” nature names are not all that feminine. I’m constantly defending [name_f]Jade[/name_f] for a boy because apparently green rocks are female. And also [name_f]Azure[/name_f] is female even though the color blue usually signifies male.

I’m not one of those “it’s a nature name so it’s automatically unisex” people. I think it’s pretty safely a girls name given that its history of use as a name has mostly been for females.

I find it interesting that several berries happen to know a man named [name_f]Willow[/name_f]. From 1965-1995, it was used 5 times or more three times (6x in 1991 and 5x in each 1979 and 1992).

I don’t especially like it on boys, but it could probably work. Reminds me of the movie : )

I think [name_f]Willow[/name_f] is great for a boy. Names ending in -o are gaining popularity, so I don’t think he’d be too out of place.

I think it could work great. Especially starting with “[name_m]Will[/name_m]-.”

I have a son named [name_f]Wren[/name_f], and that is usually a girls’ name, but we’ve not heard anything but positive comments on it. :slight_smile:

3 people is several?

Yes I know a male [name_f]Willow[/name_f]. I also know a male [name_f]Jasmine[/name_f] and a male [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]. Actually I know a lot of men with “feminine” names. [name_m]Just[/name_m] one of the perks of being raised in one of the most diverse and eclectic parts of the country

I just happen to run in a diverse crowd. Men down here in the south tend to get names like [name_u]Ashley[/name_u], [name_u]Shannon[/name_u], [name_u]Whitney[/name_u], [name_u]Darcy[/name_u] etc still and I run in the pagan and art crowd, so know some very greatly named people. I don’t know if both the men I know named [name_f]Willow[/name_f] if it’s their birth name (I know one of them is [name_f]Willow[/name_f] on his birth cert. but the other might just be using it). I know men named [name_f]Wren[/name_f], [name_f]Jade[/name_f], Kohana…I’ve got a whole list (because I’m a weirdo who keeps up with the names of people I know that I find interesting.)

Anyway, chill :stuck_out_tongue:

I don’t know any Willows. All of the Willows I 've heard of previous to this post are girls. I would prefer any of the other [name_m]Will[/name_m] names for a boy minus [name_f]Wilhelmina[/name_f] and [name_f]Wilma[/name_f]. I’m currently crushing a little on [name_m]Willem[/name_m], which many people seem to think unusable.

I [name_f]LOVE[/name_f] [name_f]Wren[/name_f] on a boy. There’s nothing feminine about the name, so I never understood the “girls only” rule for it.

I [name_f]ADORE[/name_f] [name_f]Willow[/name_f] on a boy!

Ooo I love [name_f]Wren[/name_f] for a boy. I actually prefer it.

[name_f]Willow[/name_f] is lovely for a boy too :slight_smile:

Yep I agree with this. While [name_f]Willow[/name_f] is generally used more for girls, I think it could work on a little boy just fine

Although this is a nature name I do tend to lean more towards a girl with this name then a boy. In today’s time I do see more people who would possibly use this as a boys name however, I hear it and I think girl automatically.

Totally agree with this.
It is primarily known as a female name so I would safely keep this as a girls name.