Continuing the discussion from Would you have like to have been called ..? (Part 1) - #10029 by judy.newstead.
Previous discussions:
Continuing the discussion from Would you have like to have been called ..? (Part 1) - #10029 by judy.newstead.
Previous discussions:
The last name on pt. 1 was Kinga…
It’s not for me, I think
[name_u]Shirley[/name_u]?
I don’t think so
[name_f]Star[/name_f]?
No
[name_u]January[/name_u]?
No
Kimberlia?
No
Natasja?
Not for me, but it is lovely.
[name_f]Helen[/name_f]?
Sure, I’d go by [name_f]Nell[/name_f] or [name_f]Nellie[/name_f]!
[name_f]Amy[/name_f]?
Not really.
[name_f]Rosalind[/name_f]?
Yeah I’d go by [name_f]Rose[/name_f] though
[name_f]Marguerite[/name_f]?
Only if I had a nickname for daily use.
[name_m]Jason[/name_m]?
No
[name_f]Laura[/name_f]
No.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f]?
No, not for a first name but maybe a middle name
[name_f]Olive[/name_f]
No
[name_f]Nicole[/name_f]?
Not really, but probably not as a first.
[name_u]Jamie[/name_u]?
No
[name_f]Ophelia[/name_f]?
Not more than my real name, but I like it!
[name_f]Tallulah[/name_f]?
No, I don’t think it would suit me.
[name_u]Holly[/name_u]?
Actually I wouldn’t have anything against it.
[name_f]Mikaela[/name_f] ?