Our 2 runner ups so far are [name_m]Wyatt[/name_m] or [name_m]Titan[/name_m]. Which do you think goes best with sibset?
[name_m]Sylas[/name_m] ans [name_f]Violet[/name_f]
I think [name_m]Wyatt[/name_m] is my fav out of the two, but I’m afraid it may be too much with [name_f]Violet[/name_f]. Another concern is its popularity.
I like that it’s a classic name just like my other two children’s names. Middle name would be [name_m]Danger[/name_m]
[name_m]Wyatt[/name_m] [name_m]Danger[/name_m].
[name_m]Titan[/name_m], I do like but feel its too strong of a name. It does work best with sibset.
I have no middle name for [name_m]Titan[/name_m]
While I do agree that [name_m]Wyatt[/name_m] and [name_f]Violet[/name_f] are very similar, I prefer [name_m]Wyatt[/name_m] with the sibset. [name_m]Titan[/name_m] doesn’t match quite as well, but it isn’t as matchy which is nice. Overall, [name_m]Titan[/name_m] has to be my favorite because it’s much easier to say “[name_m]Sylas[/name_m], [name_f]Violet[/name_f], and [name_m]Titan[/name_m]” than it is to say “[name_m]Sylas[/name_m], [name_f]Violet[/name_f], and [name_m]Wyatt[/name_m]”. [name_m]Titan[/name_m] [name_m]Danger[/name_m] is also a very strong name. Good luck, I hope this helps!
Have you considered [name_m]Titus[/name_m]? I think it would go really well with [name_m]Sylas[/name_m] and [name_f]Violet[/name_f].
[name_f]Violet[/name_f] and [name_m]Wyatt[/name_m] are very sing-songy, so between the two I’d go with [name_m]Titan[/name_m], even though it sounds like a verb - “tighten.”
I agree [name_m]Titan[/name_m] [name_m]Danger[/name_m] is too much. That was never an option. It would either be
[name_m]Wyatt[/name_m] [name_m]Danger[/name_m] or probably [name_m]Titan[/name_m] [name_m]Maxwell[/name_m]