It isn’t surprising that the [name]California[/name] list is similar to the national one. It also wouldn’t be surprising for [name]Texas[/name] and New [name]York[/name] to be as well. The three states are a combined fourth of the US population, so I imagine that we drive the national list to a large extent.
What I found interesting in the [name]Texas[/name] data was that the boys’ names on the top 100 list that aren’t on the national list are largely indicative of the Hispanic population:
[name]Alejandro[/name], [name]Santiago[/name], [name]Eduardo[/name], [name]Victor[/name], [name]Jorge[/name], [name]Joel[/name], [name]Damian[/name], [name]Ricardo[/name], [name]Oscar[/name], [name]Leonardo[/name], [name]Fernando[/name], [name]Ivan[/name], [name]Francisco[/name], [name]Javier[/name], [name]Jesse[/name], [name]Edgar[/name], [name]Alan[/name], [name]Andres[/name]
The girl’s names that are Top 100 in [name]Texas[/name] but not on the national Top 100 aren’t.
[name]Daniela[/name], [name]Natalia[/name], [name]Jennifer[/name], [name]Stephanie[/name], [name]Giselle[/name], [name]Valerie[/name], [name]Michelle[/name], [name]Miranda[/name], [name]Leslie[/name], [name]Liliana[/name], [name]Amy[/name], [name]Ruby[/name], [name]Gabriela[/name], [name]Angela[/name], [name]Fernanda[/name], [name]Jacqueline[/name], [name]Briana[/name]
Equally interesting are the names Texans just aren’t warming up to (or else are so over by now):
Boys:
[name]Liam[/name], [name]Owen[/name], [name]Chase[/name], [name]Henry[/name], [name]Brody[/name], [name]Dominic[/name], [name]Cole[/name], [name]Cooper[/name], [name]Carson[/name], [name]Blake[/name], [name]Eli[/name], [name]Colton[/name], [name]Brian[/name], [name]Parker[/name], [name]Sean[/name], [name]Oliver[/name], [name]Kyle[/name]
Girls:
[name]Amelia[/name], [name]Autumn[/name], [name]Charlotte[/name], [name]Claire[/name], [name]Eva[/name], [name]Gabrielle[/name], [name]Gianna[/name], [name]Isabelle[/name], [name]Julia[/name], [name]Mackenzie[/name], [name]Maya[/name], [name]Molly[/name], [name]Morgan[/name], [name]Mya[/name], [name]Paige[/name], [name]Payton[/name], [name]Rachel[/name]
Aside from names not making mutual lists, there are also some significant popularity differences:
[name]Anna[/name], [name]Riley[/name], [name]Lillian[/name], [name]Grace[/name], [name]Lily[/name] are all much more popular nationally for girls than they are in [name]Texas[/name] (ranking 43, 42, 40, 34 and 34 positions lower in [name]Texas[/name] than in the US. On the flip side, we’re more fond of [name]Andrea[/name], [name]Genesis[/name], [name]Valeria[/name], [name]Camila[/name], [name]Melanie[/name] in the [name]Lone[/name] [name]Star[/name] State (47, 53, 55, 56, and 59 spots higher here than in the US at large.)
On the boy’s team, [name]Lucas[/name], [name]Carter[/name], [name]Connor[/name], [name]Tyler[/name], [name]Jack[/name], [name]Thomas[/name] are all at least 35 positions more popular elswhere in the US than they are here, while we have [name]Diego[/name], [name]Carlos[/name], [name]Miguel[/name], [name]Juan[/name], [name]Jesus[/name] at 45+ positions more popular here.
That’s a fascinating trend to me, how much the Hispanic population influences the boy’s list, but it isn’t noticeable on the girls. It would suggest that Hispanic boys are being given more traditional names, while the Hispanic girls’ name pool must be expanding. Very much mirrors the trend in US name pools, where boys’ names tend to have more staying power.