Baby has no name!

We are stuck between [name_u]London[/name_u] and [name_f]Ivy[/name_f], middle name will be [name_u]Brooke[/name_u], last name [name_m]Smith[/name_m]…help!! She is already 2 days old lol

I’m actually digging [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_u]London[/name_u] [name_m]Smith[/name_m] or [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] [name_u]London[/name_u] [name_m]Smith[/name_m].

I love [name_u]London[/name_u] [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] [name_m]Smith[/name_m]! I feel like [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] would sounder like a brook that has [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] in it besides I love the sound of [name_u]London[/name_u] [name_u]Brooke[/name_u]!

I love [name_f]Ivy[/name_f].

I much prefer [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] for a first name over [name_u]London[/name_u].

[name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_u]London[/name_u] or [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_u]Brooke[/name_u]…

Congrats on the new addition to your family!

I like both [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] and [name_u]London[/name_u], maybe [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] just a smidgen more, but I don’t think either of them go well with [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] :frowning: It makes me think of a brook in [name_u]London[/name_u] or a brook filled with ivy. Also because your last name is one syllable, it has a very choppy sound to it.

I love both names and I know that isn’t any help to you, so I think I would choose [name_u]London[/name_u] because it is more uncommon to go with [name_m]Smith[/name_m]. You can’t go wrong with either.

I [name_u]LOVE[/name_u] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] [name_m]Smith[/name_m]!

[name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_u]London[/name_u] is great :slight_smile:

[name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] [name_m]Smith[/name_m].

Wow it seems like people are really split down the middle on this one. I doubt we’ve made this decision any easier for you lol. Personally I would go with [name_u]London[/name_u]. I like both names but [name_u]London[/name_u] just “goes” with [name_u]Brooke[/name_u]. However if you aren’t opposed to two middles you could “mush” them all together. It may not have the best flow, but that way you would get what you want. Also you can always decides which one suits her more later on. [name_m]Just[/name_m] a thought.

Best Wishes*

I agree with other posters, that although they are lovely names [name_u]London[/name_u] [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] and [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] to me are too descriptive together. I love love [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_u]London[/name_u] but find [name_u]London[/name_u] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] a bit descriptive as well. In saying that it is whatever you fall in love with and the descriptiveness may not bother you.

Oohhh and a second vote for [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] [name_u]London[/name_u]

[name_u]Brooke[/name_u] [name_u]London[/name_u]! [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] in the middle sounds very descriptive. Best Wishes choosing just go with what feels right!

Definitely prefer [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]! What a gorgeous name. London doesn’t sound feminine at all for me. I live in London and would find it very strange to meet someone with that name.

all great names but I’m not a fan of the first names with the middle name [name_u]Brooke[/name_u].

But I agree with the other posters…[name_u]London[/name_u] [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] reminds me of [name_u]London[/name_u] bridge and [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] sounds like the name & location of a [name_u]Brooke[/name_u].

[name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_m]Smith[/name_m] sounds beautiful! I think [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_u]London[/name_u] [name_m]Smith[/name_m] would be perfect!

I like [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_u]London[/name_u]. But if [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] as a middle is non-negotiable, then I would go with [name_u]London[/name_u] [name_u]Brooke[/name_u].

[name_f]Hope[/name_f] you find a name soon! :slight_smile:

I think [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] [name_m]Smith[/name_m] is adorable.

Thanks everyone! [name_u]Brooke[/name_u] is non negotiable as a middle as its honoring a family member and we already told family it would be included. The real debate has been which of the two lovely names we have to use as a first and I am SO torn. I think we are going to double up on middles just so we don’t have to let either name go entirely, and call her [name_u]London[/name_u] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_u]Brooke[/name_u]… I like the option with [name_u]London[/name_u] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] to use [name_f]Liv[/name_f] or [name_f]Livy[/name_f] as a little nickname. [name_u]Love[/name_u] hearing everyone’s thoughts on this, I’m still afraid to commit lol