Hahahahaha oh god! Best idea yet
[name_f]Catherine[/name_f] and [name_f]Kathryn[/name_f] are pronounced differently. Cath-er-ine. Kath-ryn.
OP: I like [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] or [name_f]Catherine[/name_f], both are classic. I donāt like [name_f]Katharine[/name_f]. Itās less common, which I guess is an allure to some people, but you say the name the same way as [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] and [name_f]Catherine[/name_f], so Iād stick with one of those or else youāre daughter is just going to have a lot of misspelled documents in life if you go with the lesser common [name_f]Katharine[/name_f].
[name_f]Catherine[/name_f] it seems more classic
[name_f]Catherine[/name_f]. For me, itās a family name, but it just seems so much softer and prettier to me. Besides, I think [name_f]Cat[/name_f] is adorable.
I like [name_f]Kathryn[/name_f] too!
Funny, I like [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] because she seems softest and most classic (I feel like the āKā spellings are all reminiscent of the āCā names spelled with a āKā to look ākoolā, even though I know theyāre legitimate, and Iām excited to find out [name_f]Katharine[/name_f] has Shakespearean rootsāhow did I miss that?!). I have grown to like all three, but I like [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] far and away the best of them all. [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] nn [name_u]Kit[/name_u] is on my own list.
I like [name_f]Catherine[/name_f]. I think [name_f]Cate[/name_f] looks better than [name_f]Kate[/name_f]. Plus this is how my aunt spells her name so Iām used to it.
Yāall⦠[name_f]Kathryn[/name_f] and [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]/[name_f]Catherine[/name_f] are pronounced differently. [name_f]Kathryn[/name_f] is two syllables. [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] is three.
Haha, I was just about to point that out. There are two reasons why [name_f]Kathryn[/name_f] is NOT in my list.
A) Itās said differently, normally Iām not picky with pronunciations, but this is the difference of 1 big syllable - Cath-ER-in vs Kath-ryn.
B) Iāve never liked the [name_f]Kathryn[/name_f] spelling. [name_u]Ever[/name_u].
So, thank you to those of you who did suggest it, but, there was a reason why it wasnāt appearing
I say them both as two syllables⦠kath-uh-rin feels very awkward for me. Iāve never been a huge fan of the name with any spelling, though ([name_f]Kitty[/name_f] is a favourite, though).
Well⦠that extra āeā in [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] isnāt in there for fun. Itās there to be said. Itās three syllables. Also itās not said kath-uh-rin. Itās kath-er-ine.
Thatās just being pedantic, really. Unless youāre pronouncing the middle syllable with a lot of emphasis (which sounds ridiculous)⦠surely it sounds like āāah/uh/ehāā anyway? Like, [name_f]Isobel[/name_f] and [name_f]Isabel[/name_f] have the same pn, as the sound is so tiny between the S-B.
Or maybe the fact my English lack of the heavy 'āerrrrā sound is affecting it?
I personally like [name_f]Catherine[/name_f]ā¦probably just because I love the nn. [name_f]Catie[/name_f] lol. The rest donāt do much for me
No itās not. Itās spelled [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] because itās pronounced kath-er-ine. Itās not a very strong emphasis on the middle er sound. If it were pronounced Kath-rin, it would be spelled [name_f]Kathryn[/name_f]. Not pronouncing it correctly is just lazy, and I bet for people named [name_f]Katherine[/name_f], is probably annoying when people donāt annunciate your name.
IMHO if you like the NN [name_f]Kate[/name_f] or [name_f]Katie[/name_f] use a K spelling.
[name_f]Cate[/name_f]/ [name_f]Catie[/name_f] looks weird to me.
Out of your three [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] is the most appealing. However, I prefer [name_f]Kathryn[/name_f] (Iām biased as thatās my name!).
I strongly dislike [name_f]Katherine[/name_f], think that [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] is okay, but I love [name_f]Katharine[/name_f].
[name_f]Katherine[/name_f] is very popular so if you are looking for an uncommon way to spell a pretty name, go with [name_f]Katharine[/name_f]. Also the a looks more attractive.
Hmm, I really love the [name_f]Katharine[/name_f] Hepburn connection, but I love [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] too, Iām a bit meh over [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] now. Would a [name_f]Katharine[/name_f]/[name_f]Catherine[/name_f] always have to correct the spelling of her name anyways, or would [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] make life easier?
I donāt know where youāre from; but I think this may actually be a regional thing. In Australia, they would be virtually pronounced the same, unless corrected otherwise. After that everyone would try to say it as directed, however, for British Australians that pronunciation is actually more difficult then it looks. Typically, we donāt always pronounce full syllables, they kind of end up slurred together, not intentionally at all I assure you. But for most of us it would make the sound severly chopped up, which I think is what oliviasarah is saying.
So, itās not necessarily lazy, just they way others pronounce it.